Recently, NBA insider Brian Windhorst fueled a intense debate on social media.
He mentioned that Allen Iverson wouldn’t be able to put up the sort of numbers he put up in these days’s era, arguing that he wasn’t an economical scorer.
On the other hand, the previous Philadelphia 76ers star didn’t clap again at his reviews.
Alternatively, he took the higher road and claimed that it was just Windhorst’s viewpoint.
With that in thoughts, former NBA All-Star Gilbert Arenas shared a related considered.
“At the end of the working day, what’s the issue of arguing more than what if’s and principle?” Arenas said.
At the close of the day, there's no debating greatness 
@ShannonSharpe @GilsArenaShow @alleniverson pic.twitter.com/76autWrulc
— Nightcap (@NightcapShow_) March 23, 2024
Chatting to Shannon Sharpe on his Nightcap display, Arenas claimed that the full debate was pointless simply because it was primarily based entirely on what-ifs and hypotheticals.
He also thinks that good players find a way to be fantastic no matter of the era, adding that Iverson was a incredibly competent participant.
That’s really a great deal in which the discussion finishes.
Iverson performed in the changeover from 1 of the most physical eras in NBA record to a more quickly-paced sport, and he thrived in equally.
On major of that, most of the elite scorers of that period weren’t as successful as they are these days that was a byproduct of the rules, the scheming, and the way defense was performed again then.
Excellent gamers are obsessed with their craft, and they usually obtain a way to maximize their game and affect.
The article Gilbert Arenas Suggests 1 NBA Discussion Is Pointless appeared initial on The Cold Wire.
